It is a myth that King Arthur was an adversary of the Romans
It is a myth that King Arthur was an adversary of the Romans
Possibly a real man but.....

Everyone has heard the stories about King Arthur, temporary savior of the Britons from the invading Anglo-Saxons, however was he a real man? It's absolutely viable, say a few historians. Although Arthur would not seem in any modern-day ancient sources, there's an excellent quantity of evidence that suggests some truly powerful warfare leader, maybe named Arthur, lived at some point of the 5th or sixth centuries. 


For example, near Arthur's beginning site of Tintagel in Cornwall, a 6th-century engraving turned into located, committed by way of a guy named Artognou. At his capital of Camelot, long concept to be in modern-day Colchester, archaeologists found what might have been the real-existence Round Table. And what if Arthur wasn't his real call? There's concrete evidence that a cutting-edge British leader who bore the moniker of "Riothamus" (no longer a call, but a title, which translates to "excessive king") would possibly've been the model for Arthur.

What's your reaction?

Facebook Conversations

Disqus Conversations